Busybody: Dexter

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, May 17, 2010

Amy's Choice

Posted on 3:47 AM by Unknown
Doctor-lite stories have a curious track record. Love and Monsters remains the most divisive story of the new series, Blink the most popular, and Turn Left the triumphant last gasp of the Davies era before a bad finale brought it to its knees. Amy's Choice isn't Doctor-lite, but it may as well be, strutting with the same determination to ignore the rules and throw something bizarre at us, only this time with the Doctor getting his usual screen time. It's by far the weirdest story of the new series, and in a good way, as if David Lynch had been commissioned to write under the name of Simon Nye. Needless to say, if Lynchian dreamscapes don't work for you, neither will Amy's Choice, and judging from nasty reviews circling the web at the moment, that seems to be the case for many Doctor Who fans.

I adore Amy's Choice. I'm confident that posterity will judge it a classic. The story finds the Doctor, Amy, and Rory flicking back and forth between two scenarios, one of which is a dream they are sharing, the other reality. They are told, by a mysterious figure called the Dream Lord, that to die in the dream will cause them to wake up in reality for good. To die in the real scenario will cause them to, well, really die. One takes place inside the TARDIS which has gone dark and freezing as it hurtles towards a cold sun. The other takes place five years later in the village of Ledworth, with Rory and Amy happily married and pregnant; the Doctor is visiting them, and they are confronted by a group of zombie-like elderly people who can barely walk but are hell-bent on murder. Our three heroes must agree which scenario is the dream, and allow themselves to be killed in it, in order to escape the Dream Lord's puzzle.

The tricky ground where dreams and reality blur is difficult to tame without waxing cliche, and make no mistake, Amy's Choice treads over familiar pastiches. On top of that, the "arena" situation has been worked over in plenty of science fiction dramas, in which protagonists are forced by an omnipotent power to solve puzzles and fight for their lives. But Nye makes it all work by subordinating the material to the love triangle between the Doctor, Amy, and Rory, and to the final revelation of the Dream Lord's identity. This climax is crucial to the story's success, but for reasons that escape me has upset many viewers. The Dream Lord isn't a rival or enemy of the Doctor (like the Master or Celestial Toymaker), but rather the personification of his darkest feelings and doubts, even his self-loathing (sort of like The Valeyard). His insults paint the Doctor as woefully insecure about being abandoned by Amy, call into question his motives for taking on a young companion (part of him evidently wanted to raped by her after all), and skewer him for the callous manner in which he treats his friends. It doesn't take the Doctor long to recognize his inner demon and hurl the contemptuous self-indictment: "I know who you are -- there's only one person in the universe who hates me as much as you do." Brilliant. I don't understand the clamor for a more traditionally Manichean foe; going that route would have trivialized if not killed the story.

Nor do I understand the complaints about the psychic pollen, described by the Doctor as "a mind parasite which feeds on everything dark inside you, gives it a voice, and turns it against you". (I love his flip answer to Amy, who demands to know why the pollen didn't also feed on her and Rory. "Oh, the darkness inside you pair, it would have starved to death in an instant; I choose my friends with great care.") Though of course, one follows the other: if one objects to the Boethian nature of the Dream Lord, the pollen must be condemned as well. But again, the fact that the true villain of the story is the Doctor's shadow-self is what makes the story work.

As for the secondary villains, the old pensioners work extremely well. That they are aliens underneath is classic Doctor Who, but they are quite menacing apart from this, even without the tongue-like protrusions which blast people to ash. Watching the Doctor and Rory take on these decrepit old ladies is hilariously grand -- surely only a viewer with a dull imagination (or, admittedly, a less perverse sense of humor than mine) could fail to be amused by the sight of feeble grandmas getting whacked by crowbars and thrown off the roofs of houses. That's solid entertainment.

The visuals are superb and work dynamically in contrast, as we shuffle back and forth between an idyllic countryside and a darkened TARDIS. The former exudes a wrong tone from the start, precisely because everything seems "too right", and the latter becomes increasingly horrifying as our three heroes become covered in frost and barely able to speak or move -- and is there even such thing as a "cold star"? Both scenarios are disturbing and off-kilter, and it's hard to decide which could be real.

Amy's choice is, of course, ultimately a choice between two men: the fantasy hero from her childhood, and her less than impressive fiancee, who turns out to be the more impressive one after all. She sees the truth of this only when Rory is killed (in the Ledworth scenario), and, lashing out at the Doctor who is unable to save him, decides to kill herself in turn irrespective of whether or not she is dreaming. That the TARDIS scenario turns out to be a dream too is a nice twist that I didn't see coming, and makes sense given that a Dream Lord wouldn't logically have power over any reality. But it also suggests there was a never a "right" choice Amy had to make. Her preference for Rory is based entirely on how she feels in a certain moment. She confronts her devotion to two very different men in a particular now just as the Doctor must face his own demons. The story is ingeniously introspective, a welcome rarity in Doctor Who, and in my opinion a work of art.

Rating: 5 stars out of 5.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • "Liberal" and "Conservative" Labels
    It looks like The Biblioblog Top-50 might reinstate the practice of labeling us by our liberal/conservative leanings. I can't say I...
  • Guy Gavriel Kay, Ranked
    Most fantasy readers are familiar with Guy Gavriel Kay. He practically invented the sub-genre of historical fantasy, that mixed tricky groun...
  • Classic D&D Modules Ranked
    Extending my earlier pick list , here are 40 classic D&D modules ranked from best to worst. I hold a classic to be a module published be...
  • D&D Campaign Settings Ranked
    Over a year ago I ranked what I consider to be the best D&D modules of all time . That post is still popular (currently averaging eight ...
  • Ingmar Bergman's Influence on The Exorcist
    Forty years ago was a special year. "1973 began and ended with cries of pain," wrote Roger Ebert . "It began with Ingmar Berg...
  • FAQ's about The Secret Gospel of Mark Unveiled
    Check out Peter Jeffery's excellent answers to the following FAQ's about his book : Morton Smith was an eminent scholar in his day,...
  • The Best D&D Encounter Areas
    Having ranked the Best Dungeons & Dragons Modules , I've now done the same for encounter areas. For purposes of this exercise, ...
  • Dexter: The Seven Seasons Ranked
    I'm still reeling from the season-seven finale, and if I were wise I'd probably wait a few weeks before attempting a list like this....
  • Is Professor James Gellar real?
    With eight episodes down and four to go in Dexter's sixth season, it's time to take the question head on: is Professor James Gellar...
  • A Tribute to Ellen Page
    On this day seven years ago, October 24, 2004, the premiere of the bio-tech thriller Regenesis aired on Canadian TV, with Ellen Page playin...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (18)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (81)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2011 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2010 (107)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ▼  May (12)
      • The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood
      • Ms. Anastasopoulou Stapled to the Wall
      • Chilton on Gnosticism
      • The New Yorker on Jesus
      • Amy's Choice
      • More from Peter Jeffery
      • Women "Saved" Through Childbearing (I Tim 2:15)
      • Dangerous Dreams: Inception and Amy's Choice
      • Vampires of Venice
      • Is Atonement Essential for Christianity?
      • Callused Israel
      • The Time of Angels/Flesh and Stone
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2009 (110)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (10)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2008 (83)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2007 (58)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (12)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile